Outcome Measures and the Importance of (Early) Disease Activity Monitoring in SSc
en-GBde-DEes-ESfr-FR

Outcome Measures and the Importance of (Early) Disease Activity Monitoring in SSc


Prioritising definitions

The high heterogeneity of systemic sclerosis makes it a major challenge for clinical management and trial design.1 New data presented at the 2026 annual congress of EULAR – The European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology – shine a light on outcomes and early monitoring. This includes a way to stratify patients by disease activity index at study entry, an approach which could help enrich cohorts for clinical trials.

In an oral abstract presentation on Thursday 4th June, results were shared from a longitudinal observational analysis of the EUSTAR database – a large multicentre online database that prospectively follows more than 25,000 patients across over 200 international centres. The aim was to characterise organ involvement and disease progression – and time to these events – stratified by having a modified disease activity index (mDAI) score of less than 2.5 at baseline (inactive), versus those with 2.5 or higher (active). Of the 3,214 patients included, 59.1% had inactive disease. Those with active disease at baseline showed higher cumulative incidence rates of organ and multi-system involvement at 1 year, underscoring the relevance of disease-activity monitoring. This was particularly true for skin involvement, digital ulcers/gangrene, interstitial lung disease, and cardiac involvement – with shorter median times to these events for active versus inactive disease. Patients with active disease also required more immunosuppressive therapy, biologics, and antifibrotics as monotherapy compared to those with inactive disease.

Presenting the work at the Congress in London, Tânia Santiago said “This study provides novel insights into the natural history of systemic sclerosis, as stratified by the mDAI, underscoring the importance of early disease activity assessment”.

A poster from Corrado Campochiaro and colleagues considered points-to-consider for reporting outcomes measures in interventional studies on digital ulcers – an initiative from a committee of the World Scleroderma Foundation. Digital ulcers are one of the most painful and disabling aspects of systemic sclerosis, but there is a lack of consistency in their definition and reporting. The work – based on a systematic literature review – identified seven domains as essential for standardised reporting in clinical trials. These include uniform definition and classification, clear inclusion and exclusion criteria for trial enrolment, and standardised outcome measures based around healing of the cardinal ulcer and improvement in function, with secondary outcomes including pain, function, quality of life, and patient-reported outcomes. The points-to-consider also emphasise the need for detailed reporting of background and concomitant therapies, local wound management protocols, and the timing and frequency of assessments – with prespecified intervals and long-term follow-up for ulcer recurrence. Finally, trial design and analysis should consider seasonal and environmental factors such as the impact of climate. The authors believe that adoption could help to enhance the quality, consistency, and interpretability of interventional studies, as well as facilitating more robust meta-analyses, improving comparability across trials, and ultimately support the development of effective, patient-centred therapies.

As noted in the 2023 update of the EULAR guidelines, the future research agenda includes consideration of novel interventions for the management of vascular, musculoskeletal, and gastrointestinal manifestations and calcinosis – as well as for the local management of digital ulcers.1 In light of this, the new findings showcased at EULAR 2026 are important. The field is evolving, with approved drugs and earlier vascular interventions – and this calls for more refined assessment.

Source

Santiago T, et al. Clinical value of modified EUSTAR disease activity index to stratify for clinical outcome: A longitudinal Observational Analysis of the EUSTAR Database. Presented at EULAR 2026; OP0213. Ann Rheum Dis 2026; DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2026-eular.B.4477.

Campochiaro C, et al. Points to consider for reporting outcomes measures in systemic sclerosis interventional studies on digital ulcers: An initiative from the World Scleroderma Foundation digital ulcer ad hoc committee. Presented at EULAR 2026; POS0321. Ann Rheum Dis 2026; DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2026-eular.B.1521.

References

1. Del Galdo F, et al. EULAR recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis: 2023 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2025;84(1):29–40. DOI: 10.1136/ard-2024-226430.

Regions: Europe, Switzerland
Keywords: Health, Medical

Disclaimer: AlphaGalileo is not responsible for the accuracy of content posted to AlphaGalileo by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the AlphaGalileo system.

Testimonials

For well over a decade, in my capacity as a researcher, broadcaster, and producer, I have relied heavily on Alphagalileo.
All of my work trips have been planned around stories that I've found on this site.
The under embargo section allows us to plan ahead and the news releases enable us to find key experts.
Going through the tailored daily updates is the best way to start the day. It's such a critical service for me and many of my colleagues.
Koula Bouloukos, Senior manager, Editorial & Production Underknown
We have used AlphaGalileo since its foundation but frankly we need it more than ever now to ensure our research news is heard across Europe, Asia and North America. As one of the UK’s leading research universities we want to continue to work with other outstanding researchers in Europe. AlphaGalileo helps us to continue to bring our research story to them and the rest of the world.
Peter Dunn, Director of Press and Media Relations at the University of Warwick
AlphaGalileo has helped us more than double our reach at SciDev.Net. The service has enabled our journalists around the world to reach the mainstream media with articles about the impact of science on people in low- and middle-income countries, leading to big increases in the number of SciDev.Net articles that have been republished.
Ben Deighton, SciDevNet

We Work Closely With...


  • The Research Council of Norway
  • SciDevNet
  • Swiss National Science Foundation
  • iesResearch
Copyright 2026 by AlphaGalileo Terms Of Use Privacy Statement