https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.15212/CVIA.2026.0025
Announcing a new article publication for
Cardiovascular Innovations and Applications. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of two large language models (LLMs), GPT-5.2 and DeepSeek-V3.2, for simplifying cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) reports into participant-accessible language.
Participants undergoing CMR examinations were prospectively recruited. Original reports were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either GPT-5.2 or DeepSeek-V3.2. Predesigned prompts were used to guide the LLMs in generating simplified reports. Two customized structured Likert-scale questionnaires were developed to assess the performance and comprehensibility of the LLM-generated reports. The internal consistency and factor structure of these questionnaires were evaluated.
A total of 117 participants were initially recruited. After excluding four cases with unacceptable LLM-generated reports (3 numerical errors and 1 severity misclassification), seven who declined to complete the questionnaire, and six with incomplete responses, 100 participants were included in the final analysis (mean age 48.8 ± 12.6 years; 72% male). Both the performance and comprehension questionnaires demonstrated good internal consistency and interpretable factor structures. The simplified reports were associated with significantly higher questionnaire-assessed participant comprehension scores than the original reports across all four dimensions (all P < 0.013). No statistically significant differences were observed between GPT-5.2 and DeepSeek-V3.2 in radiologist-rated performance (all P > 0.01) or questionnaire-assessed participant comprehension (all P > 0.013), and no significant agreement or association was observed between LLM-rated and radiologist-rated scores (all P > 0.05).
LLMs are a promising tool for translating CMR reports into participant-accessible language. GPT-5.2 and DeepSeek-V3.2 showed no significant difference in questionnaire-assessed participant comprehension or radiologist-rated performance. However, radiologist supervision remains necessary to ensure the quality and reliability of LLM-generated reports.
# # # # # #
CVIA is available on the
ScienceOpen platform and at
Cardiovascular Innovations and Applications. Submissions may be made using
ScholarOne Manuscripts. There are no author submission or article processing fees.
Cardiovascular Innovations and Applications is indexed in the EMBASE, EBSCO, ESCI, OCLC, Primo Central (Ex Libris), Sherpa Romeo, NISC (National Information Services Corporation), DOAJ, Index Copernicus, Research4Life and Ulrich’s web Databases. Follow
CVIA on Twitter
@CVIA_Journal; or
Facebook.
Fen Sa, Pengyu Zhou and Zhixiang Dong et al. GPT-5.2 vs. DeepSeek-V3.2 in Simplifying Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Reports: A Prospective Real-World Study.
CVIA. 2026. Vol. 11(1). DOI: 10.15212/CVIA.2026.0025