Constructing Cell-Specific Causal Networks of Individual Cells for Depicting Dynamical Biological Processes
en-GBde-DEes-ESfr-FR

Constructing Cell-Specific Causal Networks of Individual Cells for Depicting Dynamical Biological Processes


Background
Causal inference is crucial in biological research, as it enables the understanding of complex relationships and dynamic processes that drive cellular behavior, development, and disease. Within this context, gene regulatory network (GRN) inference serves as a key approach for understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying cellular function.

While most well-known methods inferring GRNs for single-cell data are limited to construct GRNs at the cell type level, but not at the individual cell level. These methods fail to account for the heterogeneity among individual cells in a population. Other methods like SSN, PSSN have been proposed to construct relevance networks for individual cells. However, these methods primarily focus on correlations between genes, potentially missing causal relationships and more complex regulatory interactions.


Research Progress
In order to address a challenge of inferring causal relationships from single-cell expression profile, Xinzhe Huang et al. at the Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, have proposed a novel method to construct causal networks for individual cells, referred to as the single cell-specific causal network (SiCNet). By incorporating a statistical concept rooted in causal inference, the research team applied this causal inference framework to construct cell-specific causal networks. This method operates in two steps: (1) constructing a reference causal network from a designated reference dataset, and (2) inferring cell-specific causal networks for individual cells based on the reference network. The reference network serves as the benchmark to capture general causal relationships in gene regulation, while the cell-specific causal network utilizes the gene expression profile of an individual cell in combination with the reference network to infer causal relationships between genes (Fig.1).

By identifying the set of target genes for each regulator, the regulatory activity of each gene can be quantified by counting the number of target genes in the cell-specific network. Based on this, a network outdegree matrix (ODM) was generated for further analysis (Fig. 1d). The ODM retains the same dimensions as the original gene expression matrix (GEM), with the same number of rows and columns, but it represents the higher-order regulatory information of each gene in the network.

The results suggested that the ODM enhances the resolution and clarity of cell type distinctions, offering superior performance in terms of visualizing complex and high-dimensional data compared with the traditional GEM (Fig.2). Additionally, by analyzing cell-specific causal networks, SiCNet can identify key regulators and potential regulatory relationships in the context of cancer, shedding light on cancer progression. Furthermore, by integrating these cell-specific causal networks, SiCNet can represent the states of individual samples and detect critical states by calculating dynamic network biomarkers (DNBs) scores (Fig.3). Moreover, the research team aim to uncover regulatory processes involved in cell reprogramming and dynamic regulatory mechanisms during cellular differentiation, providing insights into factors associated with reprogramming efficiency and hematopoietic specification (Fig.4 and Fig.5).

Overall, SiCNet can reveal cellular heterogeneity and quantify gene regulation with higher throughput and resolution. This approach offers a broader perspective than individual gene expression analysis, and paves a way for deeper biological discoveries and investigations.

Future Prospects
GRN inference has long been a fundamental challenge in biology, with many unresolved issues, such as handling high-dimensional data with insufficient sample sizes, constructing networks from multiple samples, and addressing the complexities of time-series data, including temporal dependencies and feedback mechanisms. The SiCNet method incorporates causal inference while constructing networks for individual cells, offering a solution to some of these challenges. Notably, in addition to modeling at the single-cell level, SiCNet can also be applied to single samples to construct sample-specific networks. Moreover, SiCNet can be extended to spatial transcriptomics data, offering a powerful tool for capturing spatially dependent regulatory information that is crucial for understanding tissue architecture and function.

The complete study is accessible via DOI: 10.34133/research.0743
Title: Constructing Cell-Specific Causal Networks of Individual Cells for Depicting Dynamical Biological Processes
Authors: Xinzhe Huang, Luonan Chen, and Xiaoping Liu
Journal: Research, 27 Jun 2025, Vol 8, Article ID: 0743
DOI: 10.34133/research.0743
Attached files
  • Fig. 1. An overview of the SiCNet framework. (A) The SiCNet method takes reference scRNA-seq data and objective scRNA-seq data, along with protein–protein interaction (PPI) information, as inputs. It generates, as output, a set of causal networks for each cell. (B) Framework for inferring an initial reference causal network. (C) Framework for predicting single cell-specific causal networks. (D) The cell-specific networks generated as output are used for downstream analysis, including clustering, identifying key regulators, and discovering patterns of active regulators.
  • Fig. 2. Five benchmark scRNA-Seq datasets demonstrated superior clustering performance with ODM compared to GEM over existing methods. (A) t-SNE visualization of GEM for the datasets. Different colors represent different cell types. (B) t-SNE visualization of ODM for the datasets. Different colors represent different cell types. (C) The ARI metrics are used to measure performance of clustering. Clustering methods SC3, CIDR, Scanpy, SIMLR, and Supercell are used to cluster datasets. (D) The AMI metrics are used to measure performance of clustering. Clustering methods SC3, CIDR, Scanpy, SIMLR, and Supercell are used to cluster datasets. GEM, gene expression matrix; ODM, network outdegree matrix; ARI, adjusted rand index; AMI, adjusted mutual information; t-SNE, t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding.
  • 3.png
  • Fig. 4. Constructing the cell type-specific networks to uncover the key regulators during reprogramming. (A) Diagram illustrating the mouse cellular reprogramming process and the sampling time point for the datasets. (B) UMAP of cell clusters on the ODM data of the data from mouse cellular reprogramming. (C) UMAP of cell clusters on the sample labels of the data from mouse cellular reprogramming. (D) Distribution of the sample labels in each cell cluster. (E) Inferred cell lineage trajectory for the 6 cell clusters with ODM data. (F) Cell lineage structure constructed through the inferred trajectory. The layout of each network is the same; edges present in a particular cell cluster are shown in red. Labeled nodes correspond to regulators with different targets. (G) Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis on the regulators identified from each refined cell cluster-specific network. Jaccard similarity was calculated among these cell clusters with respective cell cluster-specific networks.
  • 5.png
Regions: Asia, China
Keywords: Health, Medical, Well being, Science, Life Sciences

Disclaimer: AlphaGalileo is not responsible for the accuracy of content posted to AlphaGalileo by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the AlphaGalileo system.

Testimonials

For well over a decade, in my capacity as a researcher, broadcaster, and producer, I have relied heavily on Alphagalileo.
All of my work trips have been planned around stories that I've found on this site.
The under embargo section allows us to plan ahead and the news releases enable us to find key experts.
Going through the tailored daily updates is the best way to start the day. It's such a critical service for me and many of my colleagues.
Koula Bouloukos, Senior manager, Editorial & Production Underknown
We have used AlphaGalileo since its foundation but frankly we need it more than ever now to ensure our research news is heard across Europe, Asia and North America. As one of the UK’s leading research universities we want to continue to work with other outstanding researchers in Europe. AlphaGalileo helps us to continue to bring our research story to them and the rest of the world.
Peter Dunn, Director of Press and Media Relations at the University of Warwick
AlphaGalileo has helped us more than double our reach at SciDev.Net. The service has enabled our journalists around the world to reach the mainstream media with articles about the impact of science on people in low- and middle-income countries, leading to big increases in the number of SciDev.Net articles that have been republished.
Ben Deighton, SciDevNet

We Work Closely With...


  • e
  • The Research Council of Norway
  • SciDevNet
  • Swiss National Science Foundation
  • iesResearch
Copyright 2025 by AlphaGalileo Terms Of Use Privacy Statement