Circularity currently plays a crucial part in futureproofing the infrastructure sector in the Netherlands. The complexity, uncertainty and contestation that go hand in hand with such transitions make it difficult to maintain a steady course towards a circular future. UT researcher Tom Coenen obtained his PhD on this subject on May 15th. In his thesis he describes various approaches and tools to support and drive the transition to a circular infrastructure sector in an effective and desirable way.
Coenen’s PhD thesis goes into the systemic barriers to mission-oriented transition and provides several ways of dealing with these, both for policy and organisations. The research shows that an important reason for the slow is that circularity is defined in many different ways throughout the sector. The transition is also hampered by the lack of focus in scaling circular initiatives and insufficient space for the market to devise radically circular solutions.
Mission-oriented transition assessment
In addition to the contested definition, it’s crucial for transition policy to embrace the complexity and insecurity that characterise such transitions. This means governments have to take the lead in accomplishing the circularity mission, but they must to do so together with the sector to increase support and utilise the expertise and dynamics present in the sector. The PhD thesis introduces the ‘mission-oriented transition assessment’ (MOTA) framework, which can support policy makers in anticipating the upcoming transition steps in collaboration with the sector.
Organisational change for circularity
In addition to governance and policy, such a transition also has major consequences for individual organisations. The thesis shows that the introduction of circularity by client organizations in infrastructure causes internal tensions between regular processes and people striving for circularity implementation. Using ‘institutional logics’, the research shows that allowing organisations to function according to the circularity principles requires coordination between people adhering to these different logics. This means that people who advocate the logic needed for circularity must be involved more actively in the primary organisation processes.
Ecosystem perspective
The infrastructure sector is strongly project oriented. However, this doesn’t work for circularity, as this demands reconciling life cycles that last many decades and the mutual dependence of assets within the Dutch infrastructure network. The thesis shows that these challenges can be overcome by adopting an ecosystem perspective. Through a long term-oriented value proposition to which several parties can unite, circular solutions can be developed that transcend individual projects. This does require a radically different way of working, focusing more on relationships than on contracts and assigning more importance to the early involvement of expert parties. Although several initiatives already demonstrate the feasibility, it does require a major shift in culture to transform the sector.
The content of the thesis has also been translated into Dutch in the form of a magazine, which details the most important results for practice. This magazine also contains reflections and columns by researchers and professionals from Dutch infrastructure practice.