Could Consciousness Begin Deep in the Brain? Researchers Make the Case
en-GBde-DEes-ESfr-FR

Could Consciousness Begin Deep in the Brain? Researchers Make the Case


A new hypothesis proposes that our basic sense of being conscious—the “me inside”—originates in the brainstem, an evolutionarily ancient part of the brain. Drawing on evidence from pain research, brain injuries and anesthesia, the researchers suggest that the cerebral cortex processes much of the information we experience, while brainstem circuits make that information consciously felt. The paper offers a different direction for investigating one of science’s most enduring mysteries.

Close your eyes and cover your ears. Much of the world around you disappears from view and hearing, yet your sense of being present, of being conscious, remains. What creates that basic feeling of being “you”?

A hypothesis paper published in The Neuroscientist by Prof. Marshall Devor of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Dr. Mark Baron of the Hebrew University and Harvard Medical School proposes that the answer lies deep in the brainstem.

Their argument challenges approaches that place the source of conscious experience primarily in the cerebral cortex—the brain’s folded outer layer, responsible for complex functions including language, recognition and planning. Instead, they suggest that the basic capacity to feel and experience originates in older “primitive” brainstem circuitry.

The paper brings together existing experimental findings and clinical observations to develop this theory. It does not claim to establish a proven mechanism for consciousness.

Why pain may hold a clue
The researchers build their argument around a familiar experience: pain.

Detecting a harmful stimulus and feeling pain are different things. The nervous system can trigger an automatic "reflexive" withdrawal from danger, but pain also involves a subjective experience: it hurts.

Devor and Baron argue that evidence from brain stimulation, epileptic seizures, neurological injuries and other research suggests that this feeling does not depend on the cortex in the same way that complex visual or auditory experiences do.

For example, they point out that even extensive cortical damage usually leaves pain experience intact, or even increased, while such damage can severely degrade vision and hearing. Loss of consciousness is rare. In contrast, damage to particular brainstem regions consistently causes coma. In their interpretation, these differences suggest that the brainstem may do more than just keep the cortex awake: it may generate the basic capacity for conscious experience of pain, and by extension also the other senses.

Processing information—and consciously experiencing it
The theory distinguishes between the information the brain processes robotically, like a self-driving car, and the feeling of consciously experiencing that information.

Recognizing a face, understanding a sentence, or identifying that an animal might attack, requires sophisticated processing. The researchers propose that the cortex performs most of this work. In addition, the cortex evaluates what benefit or danger might ensue. Based on this information, brainstem circuitry adjudicates which sensory streams should enter conscious experience and receive priority attention from “you”, and which should remain unattended.

This distinction could help explain why damage to particular cortical regions can remove specific abilities, such as seeing or recognizing objects, without necessarily eliminating the person’s basic awareness.

Under this model, the cortex and brainstem work together: the cortex supplies detailed information about the world, and brainstem mechanisms shine the light of subjective experience on those aspects that merit conscious attention.

An ancient foundation for the conscious mind

The paper also offers an evolutionary explanation of this task sharing.

The researchers propose that the capacity to experience pain arose as an add-on to reflexive responses to harmful stimuli, like a predator’s bite. This addition arose early in evolution. It does not take a cortical supercomputer to determine that tissue injury if bad. As brains became more complex, the expanding cortex gained increasingly more sophisticated abilities to interpret the survival significance of sights, sounds, smells and other information.

Rather than developing an entirely separate system for conscious experience to serve the progressively expanding cortex, they suggest that evolution adopted the brainstem machinery long associated with conscious experience of pain.

In this account, the most basic feeling of being conscious has ancient roots, while the richness of what we humans experience reflects the later development of more powerful information processing.

A direction for future research
The authors draw particular attention to a region of the brainstem called the mesopontine tegmentum, where previous research has identified circuits involved in coma following brain injury and loss of consciousness during surgical anesthesia.

They argue that investigating this area and its connections could help researchers test the brainstem theory and explore how neural activity becomes subjective experience.

However, while the precise mechanism remains unresolved, it is surely biological. The paper proposes a framework for further investigation rather than a completed explanation of how the brain generates consciousness.

Ultimately, Devor and Baron call for greater attention to the brainstem in the search for how the brain creates our most basic experience: being here, feeling something, and knowing the world from the inside.
Media Contacts
Prof. Marshall Devor
Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Institute of Life Sciences, and the Center for Research on Pain
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Email: marshlu@mail.huji.ac.il

Dr. Mark Baron
Department of Neurology
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Harvard Medical School
Email: mbaronse@bidmc.harvard.edu

Danae Marx
Spokesperson, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Tel: +972 52-743-4557
Email: danaemc@savion.huji.ac.il

Research Paper
“Brainstem Theory of Consciousness”
Published in The Neuroscientist
DOI: 10.1177/10738584261470362

Authors:
Marshall Devor¹˒² and Mark Baron¹˒³

Affiliations:
1. Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
2. Center for Research on Pain, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
3. Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding
The work was supported by the Fund for Research on Anesthesia at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Mark Baron receives a postdoctoral fellowship from the Evelyn Gruss-Lipper Charitable Foundation.

Regions: Middle East, Israel, North America, United States
Keywords: Science, Life Sciences, Society, Psychology

Disclaimer: AlphaGalileo is not responsible for the accuracy of content posted to AlphaGalileo by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the AlphaGalileo system.

Témoignages

We have used AlphaGalileo since its foundation but frankly we need it more than ever now to ensure our research news is heard across Europe, Asia and North America. As one of the UK’s leading research universities we want to continue to work with other outstanding researchers in Europe. AlphaGalileo helps us to continue to bring our research story to them and the rest of the world.
Peter Dunn, Director of Press and Media Relations at the University of Warwick
AlphaGalileo has helped us more than double our reach at SciDev.Net. The service has enabled our journalists around the world to reach the mainstream media with articles about the impact of science on people in low- and middle-income countries, leading to big increases in the number of SciDev.Net articles that have been republished.
Ben Deighton, SciDevNet
AlphaGalileo is a great source of global research news. I use it regularly.
Robert Lee Hotz, LA Times

Nous travaillons en étroite collaboration avec...


  • The Research Council of Norway
  • SciDevNet
  • Swiss National Science Foundation
  • iesResearch
Copyright 2026 by DNN Corp Terms Of Use Privacy Statement