From equations to intelligence: the future of AI-driven computational mechanics
en-GBde-DEes-ESfr-FR

From equations to intelligence: the future of AI-driven computational mechanics

25/12/2025 TranSpread

Computational mechanics plays a foundational role in engineering and scientific research, traditionally relying on numerical methods such as the finite element method to solve governing equations. While these approaches are highly effective for linear and well-defined problems, they face increasing challenges when addressing nonlinear behavior, multiphysics coupling, and multiscale phenomena. Recent progress in artificial intelligence (AI) has introduced powerful alternatives that accelerate computation and reduce modeling complexity. However, many AI-based approaches depend heavily on large datasets and often lack physical interpretability, limiting their reliability and extrapolation capability. Based on these challenges, there is a growing need to develop deeply integrated physics- and data-guided AI frameworks for computational mechanics.

Researchers from Queensland University of Technology, Tsinghua University, and international partner institutions reported their findings (DOI: 10.1007/s10409-025-25340-x) on July 9, 2025, in Acta Mechanica Sinica. The perspective article reviews the current landscape of AI-enhanced computational mechanics and proposes a unified roadmap for integrating physical laws with data-driven learning. By examining recent developments in physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), neural operators, and intelligent optimization, the study identifies critical bottlenecks and outlines future directions for building robust, generalizable, and efficient AI-powered computational frameworks for engineering and biomechanics applications.

The study analyzes three major paradigms in AI-enabled computational mechanics: purely data-driven models, PINNs, and neural operator learning. Data-driven approaches offer exceptional computational speed but suffer from limited interpretability and poor generalization outside training data. PINNs improve physical consistency by embedding governing equations into the learning process, yet they often encounter convergence difficulties and problem-specific constraints, particularly in multiphysics and time-dependent scenarios. Neural operators extend generalization across problem families but remain data-intensive and may violate physical principles when extrapolating.

To address these challenges, the authors propose four forward-looking research directions. First, modular neural architectures inspired by traditional computational mechanics can embed physical structure directly into network design, enhancing stability and convergence. Second, physics-informed neural operators enable resolution-invariant learning by training directly on governing equations rather than data alone. Third, physics–data-integrated AI frameworks offer unique advantages for multiphysics and multiscale biomechanics, where traditional numerical methods struggle to unify biological processes across scales. Finally, combining physical constraints with reinforcement learning opens new opportunities for structural optimization, allowing AI systems to explore non-intuitive yet physically valid designs. Together, these strategies mark a shift from black-box AI toward foundational, physics-aware intelligent computation.

“AI should not replace physical understanding, but rather amplify it,” the authors emphasize. They argue that physics-guided AI frameworks offer a path toward computational models that are not only faster but also more reliable and interpretable. By embedding conservation laws, variational principles, and physical constraints into learning architectures, these approaches reduce uncertainty and improve trustworthiness. According to the researchers, such integration is essential for deploying AI in real-world engineering and biomedical applications, where predictive reliability and physical consistency are critical.

The proposed physics- and data-guided AI frameworks have broad implications across engineering, biomechanics, and materials science. They enable faster and more reliable simulations of complex systems, including soft biological tissues, multiphase flows, and nonlinear structures. In design and optimization, physics-constrained AI combined with reinforcement learning could support real-time exploration of innovative structural configurations that outperform conventional solutions. Beyond efficiency gains, these methods also lay the foundation for digital twin technologies, offering powerful tools for prediction, diagnosis, and optimization. Overall, the study points toward a new generation of intelligent computational tools that balance data-driven flexibility with the rigor of physical laws.

###

References

DOI

10.1007/s10409-025-25340-x

Original Source URL

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-025-25340-x

Funding Information

This work was supported by the Australian Research Council (Grant No, IC190100020), the Australian Research Council Industry Fellowship (Grant No, IE230100435), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos, 12032014 and T2488101).

About Acta Mechanica Sinica

Acta Mechanica Sinica is an international journal dedicated to promoting scientific exchange across all areas of mechanics and mechanical sciences, publishing high-quality original research that spans classical and emerging fields, including interdisciplinary and data-driven mechanics, and covering theoretical, analytical, computational, and experimental advances through a wide range of article types.

Paper title: Towards the future of physics- and data-guided AI frameworks in computational mechanics
Fichiers joints
  • Physics- and data-guided AI frameworks for next-generation computational mechanics. This schematic illustrates emerging artificial intelligence frameworks that integrate physical laws with data-driven learning in computational mechanics. The figure highlights four key directions: modular neural architectures inspired by classical mechanics, physics-informed neural operators for resolution-invariant learning, AI-driven multiphysics and multiscale biomechanics modeling, and physics-constrained reinforcement learning for structural optimization. Together, these approaches aim to improve robustness, interpretability, and computational efficiency in simulating and designing complex physical systems.
25/12/2025 TranSpread
Regions: North America, United States, Asia, China, Oceania, Australia
Keywords: Science, Life Sciences, Mathematics

Disclaimer: AlphaGalileo is not responsible for the accuracy of content posted to AlphaGalileo by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the AlphaGalileo system.

Témoignages

We have used AlphaGalileo since its foundation but frankly we need it more than ever now to ensure our research news is heard across Europe, Asia and North America. As one of the UK’s leading research universities we want to continue to work with other outstanding researchers in Europe. AlphaGalileo helps us to continue to bring our research story to them and the rest of the world.
Peter Dunn, Director of Press and Media Relations at the University of Warwick
AlphaGalileo has helped us more than double our reach at SciDev.Net. The service has enabled our journalists around the world to reach the mainstream media with articles about the impact of science on people in low- and middle-income countries, leading to big increases in the number of SciDev.Net articles that have been republished.
Ben Deighton, SciDevNet
AlphaGalileo is a great source of global research news. I use it regularly.
Robert Lee Hotz, LA Times

Nous travaillons en étroite collaboration avec...


  • e
  • The Research Council of Norway
  • SciDevNet
  • Swiss National Science Foundation
  • iesResearch
Copyright 2025 by DNN Corp Terms Of Use Privacy Statement