How the Brain Responds to Positive Emotions Is Key to Resilience After Trauma, World Trade Center Responder Research Shows
en-GBde-DEes-ESfr-FR

How the Brain Responds to Positive Emotions Is Key to Resilience After Trauma, World Trade Center Responder Research Shows

10/09/2026 Elsevier

Study in Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging shows how reward processing varies among 9/11 responders, pointing to potential new targets for PTSD treatment

September 10, 2026 New research has uncovered that how the brain responds to anticipated rewards plays a key role in building psychological resilience after a traumatic experience. The findings from the new study among 9/11 responders, appearing in Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, published by Elsevier, support the premise that the capacity to notice and respond to positive information in the environment may buffer the negative effects of substantial trauma exposure.

Thousands of workers involved in rescue, recovery, and clean-up efforts after the events of September 11, 2001, showed remarkable resilience despite having experienced unprecedented trauma. In fact, resilience is a common trait of trauma-exposed individuals.

“We wanted to understand why some World Trade Center (WTC) responders and recovery workers developed chronic posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), while others maintained good psychological health despite experiencing similar extreme stressors during recovery efforts,” says co-lead investigator Robert H. Pietrzak, PhD, MPH, Professor of Psychiatry at Yale School of Medicine. “Most people recognize PTSD symptoms such as flashbacks, intrusive memories, and hypervigilance. However, PTSD can also diminish a person’s capacity to experience positive emotions, including happiness, enjoyment, and love.”

Psychological factors relying on the capacity for reward processing (positive emotions, optimism, hope) have long been linked to better stress resilience. However, the brain mechanisms underlying this link have rarely been investigated.

This study, conducted approximately two decades after 9/11 primarily among first responders with and without chronic WTC-related PTSD from the WTC Health Program General Responder Cohort, measured and mapped participants’ brain activity using functional MRI during a reward-based task.

Lead investigator Adriana Feder, MD, Professor of Psychiatry at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, points out, “Little is known about brain function during reward anticipation in resilient individuals. This study is unique in its focus on the function of reward circuitry in highly resilient individuals, compared with those with chronic PTSD and lower-exposed controls. All study participants have experienced the 9/11 WTC events and their aftermath, but the severity of exposure varied.”

Participants were divided into three groups:

1- Responders with chronic WTC-related PTSD.
2- Psychologically healthy trauma-exposed controls:
2a: Highly Resilient: Responders with substantial exposure to potentially traumatic elements of the 9/11 WTC events, such as finding human remains or being caught in the dust cloud.
2b: Lower WTC-Exposed: Responders who had minimal exposure to potentially traumatic elements during their WTC recovery effort work.

The Highly Resilient group had the strongest increase in activation in the brain areas related to how rewards are detected (the nucleus accumbens) and weighed (the ventromedial prefrontal cortex). This increase was significantly greater compared to both the PTSD group and the Lower-WTC Exposed group.

“Notably, when we surveyed participants about reward-related resilience factors like positive emotionality and hedonic experience, their responses only distinguished between responders who had PTSD, and those who did not,” says Saren Seeley, PhD, who conducted the neuroimaging analyses as a postdoctoral fellow working with Drs. Feder, Perez-Rodriguez, and Pietrzak at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. “This highlights that the brain imaging data captured something distinct from self-report.”

Editor-in-Chief of Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging Cameron S. Carter, MD, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, comments, “This is one of the first brain-imaging studies to compare how the brain responds to reward anticipation across groups of people who have experienced the same traumatic event, going beyond self-reported measures of positive emotions alone. It also highlights mechanisms of resilience in an important group to our country, first and other responders, e.g., construction workers, to the attack on the World Trade Center, 25 years after this traumatic event. Understanding how positive emotions are linked to psychological resilience can help guide clinical assessment and intervention in trauma-exposed populations.”

“One intriguing hypothesis that warrants future investigation is whether this protective neural capacity may be a modifiable therapeutic target, i.e., whether we can ‘train the brain’ to better anticipate positive outcomes to prevent or treat PTSD,” concludes co-lead investigator M. Mercedes Perez-Rodriguez, MD, PhD, Professor of Psychiatry at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.
"Differential Reward Circuitry Engagement During Anticipation in Highly Resilient World Trade Center Responders," by Saren H. Seeley, Zoe Schreiber, Agnes Norbury, Laurel S. Morris, Elisa Monti, Leah Cahn, Cindy J. Aaronson, Mary Kowalchyk, Jonathan M. DePierro, James W. Murrough, Emily R. Stern, Dennis S. Charney, Robert H. Pietrzak, M. Mercedes Perez-Rodriguez, and Adriana Feder (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2026.07.003). It appears online in Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, published by Elsevier. The article is openly available for 60 days at https://www.biologicalpsychiatrycnni.org/article/S2451-9022(26)00208-9/fulltext.

Archivos adjuntos
  • Panel A. Greater left NAcc and left vmPFC response to anticipating a potential monetary reward (Gain > Neutral > Loss, adjusted for psychotropic medication use) in Highly Resilient WTC responders, compared to both Lower WTC-exposed and PTSD groups. L=left, R=right, NAcc=nucleus accumbens, vmPFC=ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Unlabeled group comparisons all p>.06. Panel B. Unthresholded group comparison T maps (Gain > Neutral > Loss, adjusted for psychotropic medication use) masked by ventromedial prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens regions of interest. (Credit: Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging / Seeley et al.)
10/09/2026 Elsevier
Regions: Europe, Netherlands, North America, United States
Keywords: Health, Medical, Well being, Society, Psychology

Disclaimer: AlphaGalileo is not responsible for the accuracy of content posted to AlphaGalileo by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the AlphaGalileo system.

Testimonios

We have used AlphaGalileo since its foundation but frankly we need it more than ever now to ensure our research news is heard across Europe, Asia and North America. As one of the UK’s leading research universities we want to continue to work with other outstanding researchers in Europe. AlphaGalileo helps us to continue to bring our research story to them and the rest of the world.
Peter Dunn, Director of Press and Media Relations at the University of Warwick
AlphaGalileo has helped us more than double our reach at SciDev.Net. The service has enabled our journalists around the world to reach the mainstream media with articles about the impact of science on people in low- and middle-income countries, leading to big increases in the number of SciDev.Net articles that have been republished.
Ben Deighton, SciDevNet
AlphaGalileo is a great source of global research news. I use it regularly.
Robert Lee Hotz, LA Times

Trabajamos en estrecha colaboración con...


  • The Research Council of Norway
  • SciDevNet
  • Swiss National Science Foundation
  • iesResearch
Copyright 2026 by DNN Corp Terms Of Use Privacy Statement