Integrating anatomy and biology for a better pancreatic cancer prognosis
en-GBde-DEes-ESfr-FR

Integrating anatomy and biology for a better pancreatic cancer prognosis

12.12.2025 TranSpread

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is notoriously difficult to treat due to its aggressive nature and limited prognostic tools. While the traditional staging systems, such as the TNM classification, focus on anatomical factors, they fall short in providing a comprehensive prognosis. The Tianjin Grading System addresses this gap by integrating anatomical, biological, and patient condition factors. Developed using a cohort of Chinese patients, this new grading system refines patient risk stratification by incorporating crucial factors like lymph node metastasis and CA19-9 levels, offering a more holistic approach to managing PDAC. Based on these challenges, there is a need for deeper research into integrating biological markers into preoperative assessments.

Published (DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0213)in Cancer Biology & Medicine in 2025, the Tianjin Grading System, developed by Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, combines anatomical and biological data to predict patient survival more effectively than traditional staging methods. The study highlights how integrating tumor resectability, imaging-detected lymph node metastasis, serum markers like CA19-9, and nutritional status into a single grading system can significantly improve clinical decision-making. This multi-dimensional approach provides a more accurate prognosis, allowing for better-tailored treatment strategies and ultimately improving patient outcomes.

The Tianjin Grading System was developed through a retrospective study involving 687 PDAC patients who underwent surgical resection. By analyzing factors like resectability status, serum CA19-9 levels, lymph node metastasis, and the Prognostic Nutritional Score (PNS), researchers were able to identify independent prognostic factors influencing overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The patients were categorized into four distinct risk groups: low-risk (0-1), intermediate-risk (2-3), high-risk (4-5), and extremely high-risk (6-10), with significantly divergent survival outcomes for each group. Notably, patients in the high- and extremely high-risk categories benefited greatly from neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The Tianjin system outperformed traditional methods like serum CA19-9 and anatomical resectability in predicting patient survival. These findings underscore the importance of a multi-dimensional approach to assessing PDAC, improving the ability to guide treatment strategies and personalize care.

Dr. Jihui Hao, one of the lead researchers, commented, "The Tianjin Grading System offers a more accurate way of predicting outcomes for PDAC patients by integrating not just anatomical factors but also biological and patient-specific conditions. This system helps us better understand which patients will benefit most from aggressive treatments like neoadjuvant chemotherapy, paving the way for more personalized, effective care strategies."

The Tianjin Grading System has significant implications for improving clinical decision-making in PDAC treatment. By providing a more accurate prognosis, it can guide when patients should undergo upfront surgery or receive NAC. This comprehensive assessment also helps healthcare providers tailor treatment plans, improving survival rates for high-risk patients and ensuring that low-risk patients are not overtreated. The system's accessibility—using standard imaging and laboratory tests—makes it a practical tool for diverse clinical settings, including those with limited resources, offering a new standard in personalized pancreatic cancer care.

###

References

DOI

10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0213

Original Source URL

https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0213

Funding information

This work was supported by the Tianjin Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 24JCYBJC00580).

About Cancer Biology & Medicine

Cancer Biology & Medicine (CBM) is a peer-reviewed open-access journal sponsored by China Anti-cancer Association (CACA) and Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital. The journal monthly provides innovative and significant information on biological basis of cancer, cancer microenvironment, translational cancer research, and all aspects of clinical cancer research. The journal also publishes significant perspectives on indigenous cancer types in China. The journal is indexed in SCOPUS, MEDLINE and SCI (IF 8.4, 5-year IF 6.7), with all full texts freely visible to clinicians and researchers all over the world (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/2000/).

Paper title: Integrated pretreatment stratification system for pancreatic cancer: combining anatomical resectability and tumor biological parameters
Angehängte Dokumente
  • Study flow chart.
12.12.2025 TranSpread
Regions: North America, United States, Asia, China
Keywords: Health, Medical

Disclaimer: AlphaGalileo is not responsible for the accuracy of content posted to AlphaGalileo by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the AlphaGalileo system.

Referenzen

We have used AlphaGalileo since its foundation but frankly we need it more than ever now to ensure our research news is heard across Europe, Asia and North America. As one of the UK’s leading research universities we want to continue to work with other outstanding researchers in Europe. AlphaGalileo helps us to continue to bring our research story to them and the rest of the world.
Peter Dunn, Director of Press and Media Relations at the University of Warwick
AlphaGalileo has helped us more than double our reach at SciDev.Net. The service has enabled our journalists around the world to reach the mainstream media with articles about the impact of science on people in low- and middle-income countries, leading to big increases in the number of SciDev.Net articles that have been republished.
Ben Deighton, SciDevNet
AlphaGalileo is a great source of global research news. I use it regularly.
Robert Lee Hotz, LA Times

Wir arbeiten eng zusammen mit...


  • e
  • The Research Council of Norway
  • SciDevNet
  • Swiss National Science Foundation
  • iesResearch
Copyright 2025 by DNN Corp Terms Of Use Privacy Statement