Printer friendly version
Pesticides endanger bats
27 August 2012
Scientists call for inclusion in risk assessment procedures
Bats are a highly threatened group of animals and many people are concerned with their conservation. The entire group of animals is protected in Europe. 10 of the 19 bat species native to Germany are already found on the red list of threatened species. Therefore it is worrying that bats are not included in the EU-wide authorization procedures for plant protection products. A study by the University of Koblenz-Landau revealed that pesticide contamination of their diet can lead to long-term effects in bats.
Before the EU issues a pesticide approval, it will undergo a regulatory risk assessment required by law. Using various scenarios, the risks for different organisms from acute to long-term effects such as impatcs on reproduction are estimated. To date it is assessed whether new pesticides harm birds and mammals, but so far bats are not mentioned in the current relevant guideline for risk assessment in the EU.
Studies have already indicated that bats are particularly sensitive to pesticides. The threatened animals are still ignored in the risk assessment procedure, even after the amendment of the applicable regulations in 2009, since there is a lack of data according to Dr. Carsten Brühl and Peter Stahlschmidt from the Institute for Environmental Sciences at Landau. "Most studies on bats were carried out in protected areas or in forests" explains Stahlschmidt. So far it was not investigated whether bats forage for food in the agricultural landscape at all although more than half the area of Germany is used for agriculture. In a previous study, the researchers were able to detect 14 bat species on intensively managed agricultural land.
In their current study, the Landauer ecotoxicologists took a closer look on the diet of bats in a fruit-tree plantation. After spraying the commercial pesticide active ingredient fenoxycarb, which inhibits the growth of insects, the scientists measured the remaining chemical residues on flies, moths and spiders for two weeks. The highest residues were recorded on leaf dwelling insects and spiders, lower contamination was found for flying insects. Based on this data, they calculated different scenarios of the current risk assessment procedure. In the calculated best-case scenario, where the animals find their food also in unpolluted areas, long-term effects of one of the six used bat species in the calculation could not be ruled out, in the worst case scenario 3 bat species were affected. Hardest hit were so called gleaners, bats that collect insects and spiders from the leaves of the fruit trees.
The actual risk could be even higher than calculated, suspects Stahlschmidt. Because there are no sensitivity data for bats, the formulas in the risk assessment process use the toxicity data of the house mouse and add a safety factor of 5. "The bat, however, because of ecological characteristics such as a long lifetime and only one offspring is a very sensitive organism," says Stahlschmidt. Therefore, it is even likely that a difference in sensitivity between the house mouse and the bat could exceed 5. This could mean that even those species that prefer the less contaminated flying insects are at an unacceptable risk.
Something needs to change urgently if the endangered flying mammals should be effectively protected. "The responsible authorities must take action," says Stahlschmidt. "The current approval process for pesticides should be extended to bats and further research on the sensitivity of this mammalian group to pesticides is immediately needed" the researcher closes.